Related Post

13 Comments Received

OkieRover
October 8th, 2009 @8:08 am  

First let’s get this out…What a pretentious douche bag!
Maybe 1 in 1000 could answer those questions satisfactorily.

Now lets get to the heart of the matter. I had friends who were still single in their latter 30s and early 40s. They were looking for Miss Right (or at least Miss Right Now) in all the places they looked when they were in their 20s. Guess what they found, 20 somethings. And as one of them put it, “these girls are fun to look at and play with, but you just can’t talk to them about anything. Yeah, it’s cute to hear them give that school girl giggle when you start talking about nuclear proliferation and they say, ‘hehehe what’s that?’”

What this guy is trying to get to across (I think poorly) is he wants to meet someone a little deeper than a parking lot puddle. He doesn’t want to talk about Brangelina, Obama’s dog choice, or any of the latest Hollywood buzz.
I think a more entertaining approach would be to answer the questions the way he wants them and then tell him, you are not interested. I think that would be funnier.

seaside
October 8th, 2009 @8:55 am  

Damn it! Those were the same questions I was going to send ST to entice her to date me. Looks like I have to plan B….sending a case of Boone’s and the highlight tape from the 1974 national championship team.

SugarTits
October 8th, 2009 @9:52 am  

Trust me. This guy has more screws loose than my slutty, loose screwing sister.

SoonerDave01
October 8th, 2009 @12:06 pm  

“Unfortunately she sent a nice, cordial response.”

This is the internet dating equivalent of tying raw meat around your neck and running naked across the African Savannah: you’re just begging the gods of fate to let the crazies come after you.

Really, really awesome idea. Keep stringing your friend along and keep us posted on her “adventures” in cyberspace.

OkieRover
October 8th, 2009 @1:29 pm  

Perhaps we could write her a response questionaire.

1. What side of the Evidentialism v. Pragmatism debate are you on and why?

2. Be prepared to discuss Kantianism and not just the crap lecture notes you took in college.

3. The comparison of the premises of the movies Metropolis and Deathrace 2000 as they relate to the increased power of the FBI while under the directorship of J. Edgar Hoover.

4. How do the comparable physiologies of monotremes and the order Anseriformes relate?

5. Recite the 8 rules of Fight Club and how you intend to live your life by each.

That should be good to get her started.

SoonerGeas
October 8th, 2009 @1:53 pm  

ST-

I realize these aren’t as funny as your replies would have been but her reply should have gone:

1. FAH-Q
2. FAH-Q
3. FAH-Q
4. FAH-Q
5. FAH-Q
6. FAH-Q
7. FAH-Q
8. FAH-Q
9. FAH-Q
10. FAH-Q

Just saying!!!

SugarTits
October 8th, 2009 @3:15 pm  

i keep getting older, but they stay the same age.

the du
October 8th, 2009 @3:47 pm  

SugarTits I can’t believe you called your sister loose. Do you even understand true love? (Or that sometimes a guy just needs a lay? Maybe she’s just doing dudes everywhere a favor. Pun intended.)

Dirt Monkey
October 8th, 2009 @3:54 pm  

ST’s sister is really a social flesh philanthropist.

SugarTits
October 8th, 2009 @4:50 pm  

as long as he has $ in the bank, it’s worth it, right Du?

Mattress Kitten
October 8th, 2009 @5:18 pm  

Her next reply should be a paragraph explaining why she would pick a sauraphaganax over a t-rex in a fight. I can provide this if needed.

CarRamrod
October 9th, 2009 @9:52 am  

Are we sure that OkieRover and “match.com richard pryor” aren’t the same person?

Pingback & Trackback
Leave A Reply

Please Note: Comments maybe under moderation after you submit your comments so there is no need to resubmit your comment again